SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 887

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. RAMASWAMY AND K.S. PARIPOORNAN, JJ.
Awadh Bihari Yadav and others, Appellants
VERSUS
State of Bihar and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeal Nos. 7803 with 7820-21 of 1995 (arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 20490 with 21401-02 of 1993), D/- 31-8-1995.
WITH
Sita Ram Gope and others, Appellants
versus
State of Bihar and others, Respondents.
Advocates appeared
Mr. Raja Ram Agarwal, Sr. Advocate, Mr V. K. Bhagat, Mr. Manoj Yadav and Mr. Irshad Ahmad, Advocates with him, for Appellants: Mr. S. B. Sanyal, Sr. Advocate, Mr. H. L. Srivastava, Mr. B. M. Sharma and Mr. T. N. Singh, Advocates with him for appellants in C.A. Nos. 7820-21: Mr. P. N. Lekhi, Sr. Advocate, Mr. M. K. Garg, Mr. B. B. Singh and Mr. A. Sharan, Advocates with him for Respondents.

Advocates:
A.SHARAN, B.B.Singh, B.M.Sharma, H.L.SRIVASTAVA, IRSHAD AHMAD, M.K.Garg, MANOJ YADAV, P.N.LEKHI, RAJA RAM AGARWAL, S.B.SANYAL, T.N.Singh, V.K.BHAGAT

Headnote:

Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 – Section 4(1) – Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Section 12 – Appellants who obtained leave is S.L.P. (C), are the petitioners in CWJC – Intervenors and respondents in CWJC and the petitioners in CWJC, who have filed the civil appeals in pursuance to leave granted, are the appellants in the other appeals – No appeal is preferred by any of the parties in CWJC against the common judgment – State of Bihar, its officials - the Patna Municipal Corporation, the Patna Regional Development Authority, the District Land Acquisition Officer, Patna, the Buddha and its officials are the respondents in these appeals –Held, All the contentions urged on behalf of the appellants fail –Appeals are wholly without merit and we dismiss them with costs – It is distressing to note that the land acquisition proceeding which was intitiated for a very laudable purpose, more than 37 years ago, is not yet complete – At one point of time, it was brought to the notice of the Court that even the files relating to the acquisition of land are not traceable – High Court was constrained to hold, on an earlier occasion, that non-traceablity of the files must be attributed deliberate destruction of the relevant files by the "interested parties", and "but for the intervention of influential persons", the Government would not have stayed the entire proceedings as it did – Court are constrained to observe that the hands of the interested parties seem to be still active, and the intervention of such influential persons has not disappeared – Laudable and noble cause is delayed for more than 3 decades, under on pretext or the other – Courtexpress our anguish in the entire episode – Appeals dismissed.

Judgement

PARIPOORNAN, J. :- Leave granted.

2. A batch of four Writ Petitions: CWJC No 8426/88, CWJC No. 6373/88, CWJC No. 3720/90 and CWJC No. 9000/89, was heard and disposed of by the High Court of Patna by a common judgment dated 30-7-1993. The appellants who obtained leave is S.L.P. (C) No.20490 of 1993, are the petitioners in CWJC No. 8426 of 1988. The intervenors and respondents in CWJC No. 6373/88 and the petitioners in CWJC No.3720/90, who have filed the civil appeals in pursuance to leave granted in S.L.P. (C) Nos. 21401-02 of 1993, are the appellants in the other appeals. No appeal is preferred by any of the parties in CWJC No. 9000/89 against the common judgment. The State of Bihar, its officials - the Patna Municipal Corporation, the Patna Regional Development Authority, the District Land Acquisition Officer, Patna, the Buddha Griha Nirman Sahyog Samiti Ltd. and its officials are the respondents in these appeals.

3. The main contesting respondents in the above appeals are - the State of Bihar, the Patna Regional Development Authority, and the Buddha Griha Nirman Sahyog Samiti Ltd. CWJC No. 6373/88 was a writ petition filed by the Buddha Griha Nirman Sahyog Samiti Ltd., praying that approptiate directions may be given to the respondents therein (the State of Bihar and its officials, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna Regional Development Authority and District Land Acquisition Officer) to give effect to the directions given by the High Court in CWJC No. 3421/82 in the judgment dated 23-5-84, and for other consequential and incidental reliefs, including directions to the respondents to remove the encroachments or unauthorised constructions from the vacant lands which formed the subject matter of the notification. The four writ petitions were disposed of by a common judgment dated 30-7-1993, by a Division Bench of Patna High Court (S. B. Sinha and D. Sinha, JJ). By the aforesaid judgment the learned Judges directed the land acquisition officer to sign and complete the award in terms of the earlier order of the Court dated 31-7-1984, in Form 15 and to take further steps in terms of Section 12 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). CWJC No. 6373/88 was allowed to the above extent. In view of the above directions, the other writ petitions were dismissed. The learned Judges also observed that the office will 123 start preparing separate records relating to the contempt of Court matters so as to pass necessary orders, and that the authorities before whom a suit and other encroachment proceedings relating to the land under acquisition were pending, shall expedite them. Aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment, the petitioners in CWJC No. 8426/88, the respondents and intervenors in CWJC No. 6373/88 and the petitioners in CWJC No. 3720/90, after obtaining special leave have filed the aforesaid appeals.

4. We heard Mr. Raja Ram Agarwal and Mr. S. B. Sanyal, senior counsel who appeared on behalf of the appellants and Mr. P. N. Lekhi, senior counsel, Mr. B. B. Singh, Advocate and Mr. A. Sharan, Advocate, who appeared on behalf of the respondents. The subject matter in the appeal relates to land acquisition proceedings, covering an extent of about 32.48 acres in the villages of Rajapur No.3 and Dujra No.4, Perganna Phulwari, Thana Phulwari, District Patna, initiated under Section 4(1) read with Section 17(4) of the Act as amended by Bihar Act No. 18 of 1964.

5. Buddha Griha Nirman Sahyog Samiti Ltd., a society registered under the Societies Registration Act on 4-3-1958, (hereinafter called the Society), and its officials are the petitioners in CWJC No. 6373/88. The Society requested the State Government to acquire land for the purpose of providing it to doctors, lawyers, Government servants and journalists for building purpose. An extent of 25.09 acres of land was acquired under the normal procedure and the acquisition was completed on 11-7-1962. Possession of the land was taken and compensation was also p








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top