SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 989

M.M.PUNCHHI, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
Inderjeet Singh Sial – Appellant
Versus
Karam Chand Thapar – Respondent


Advocates:
MIRA MATHUR, O.P.MALHOTRA, S.K.BHATTACHARJEE, SARVA M.MITTER

Judgement

PUNCHHI, J.:- We are required in this appeal to ascribe a meaning to the word "royalty" figuring in a deed of assignment of mining rights between two beings, both devoid of regalia.

2. In its primary and natural sense "royalty", in the legal world, is known as the equivalent or translation of jura regalia or jura regia. Royal rights and prerogatives of a sovereign are covered thereuner. In its secondary sense the word "royalty" would signify, as in mining lease, that part of the reddendum, variable though, payable in cash or kind, for rights and privileges obtained. It is found in the clause of the deed which the grantor reserves something to himself out of that which he grants. It may even be a clause reserving rent in a lease, whereby the lessor reserves something for himself out of that which he grants. But "What is in a name ? a rose by any other name would smell as sweet". So said Shakespeare.

3. We will now get on to the merit of the matter.

4. The appellants are the plaintiffs. They are the heirs of one Sardar Pishora Singh Sial. By deed Ex. D-2 dated 19-11-1938, Pishora Singh obtained a mining lease from the erstwhile Government of Central Provinces for extraction of

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top