M.M.PUNCHHI, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
Regional Transport Officer Cum Taxing Authority, Rourkela – Appellant
Versus
Steel Authority Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :- The Steel Authority of India, the sole respondent herein, employs a fleet of buses meant to carry its employees from its township to its factory at Rourkela. This has been so far over three decades. For some inexplicable reasons, the Steel Authority of India Ltd. was all along being made to pay tax under Item 3 of the Scheduled to the Orissa Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1975 on buses kept by it on the footing of being goods carriers. As is the case of both sides, Item 3 hardly applicable and yet tax was kept asked and paid. With effect from 9-12-1990, the appellant herein, i. e., State of Orissa and 537 its officers, put to change the head of taxation and required the respondent to pay higher tax under Item 4 of the Schedule, where under rates of tax are prescribed for motor vehicles plying for hire and used for conveyance of passengers, including motor cabs. Challenging such step the respondent-Steel Authority of India, moved the High Court of Orissa in a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution.
2. Right at the outset, the High Court in dealing with the controversy fell into a factual error in assuming that the change effected was from Item No. 6 to Item No.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.