SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 241

M.B.SHAH, J.JAGANNADHA RAO
Wali Mohammad – Appellant
Versus
Rahmat Bee – Respondent


Judgement

M. JAGANNADHA RAO, J. :- This is an appeal by the plaintiff in the suit - O. S. No. 938 of 1976 on the file of the First Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad. The appellant filed the suit as Mutawalli and person-in-charge of the suit property, for possession. The suit was decreed by the trial Court by Judgment dated 13-10-1977. The respondent-defendant filed appeal A. S. No. 83 of 1978 and the same was allowed on 17-3-1979 by the Additional Chief Judge (cum-Special Judge S.P.E.,) City Civil Court, Hyderabad and the suit was dismissed. The plaintiff then filed Second Appeal No. 575 of 1979 in the High Court and it was dismissed on 2-8-1982. Against that Judgment, the plaintiff has filed this appeal by special leave. Pending this appeal, plaintiffs legal representatives have been brought on record. We are, however, suo motu impleading the A. P. Wakf Board as an appellant in exercise of our power under Article 136 of the Constitution of India, so as to safeguard the interests of the Wakf property.

2. The main point urged by the learned counsel for the appellant-plaintiff is that the finding of the lower appellate Court and the High Court that the respondent-defendan













































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top