SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 666

S.SAGHIR AHMAD, R.P.SETHI
Shivdev Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sucha Singh – Respondent


Judgement

SETHI, J. :- Leave granted.

2. Claiming to be the owner of the disputed property being land measuring 23 canals 2 marlas situate in village Sansra, Tehsil Ajnala, Punjab, the respondent plaintiff field a suit for possesion by way of redemption against the appellants in the Court of Additional Senior Sub Judge, Ajnala. The suit was decreed by the trial Court with a direction for delivery of possession by way 1936 of redemption on paying depositing the mortgage money of Rs. 7,000/- minus the cost of the decree. The appeal filed by the appellants was dismissed by the First Appellate Court on 25th July, 1998 and second appeal was dismissed vide the judgment impunged in this appeal.

3. It is contended on behalf of the appellants that the clause prescribing the period of mortgage did not constitutes a clog on the equity of redemption and that the suit filed before the expiry of the stipulated time was premature in terms of Section 60 of the Transfer of Property Act. In support of their contentions the appellants have relied upon the judgment of this Court in Gangadhar v. Shankar Lal, AIR 1958 SC 770 : 1959 SCR 509 and distinguished the judgment relied upon by the High Court in the
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top