SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 986

UMESH C.BANERJEE, G.B.PATTANAIK
U. P. State Road Transport Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Ram Chandra Yadav – Respondent


JUDGMENT :- Leave granted.

2. The only question that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the learned single Judge of Allahabad High Court was justified in coming to the conclusion that there has been a violation of the principle of natural justice, in course of the departmental proceeding, and on that score was justified in interfering with an order of termination of service by the departmental authority. It transpires that the respondent, a conductor under the U.P. State Road Transport Corporation faced a departmental proceeding on a set of charges, and in course of enquiry, several witnesses were examained in support of the allegations of charges that delinquent was to meet. On the basis of the evidence, the departmental authority came to the conclusion that the charges have been established, and as such inflicted the punishment of termination. The delinquent respondent assailed the legality of the said order of punishment by filing a writ petition in Allahabad High Court. The High Court came to the conclusion that the names of the witnesses, who had been examined on a particular date, were really not the witnesses for that date, though their names had been given to




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top