SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 1365

S.N.PHUKAN, V.N.KHARE
Vishwasrao Dadasaheb – Appellant
Versus
Shankarrao D. Kalyankar – Respondent


JUDGMENT :- The landlord is in appeal before us. It is not disputed that on 9-4-1970 the respondent-tenant purchased the premises, namely, C.T.S. No. 2005/1-2A situated in E. Ward of Kolhapur Municipal Corporation. Immediately on purchase of the said premises, the respondent-tenant filed a suit for eviction of his tenant. The said suit was decreed. An appeal against the decree was dismissed by the appellate Court. While these proceedings were going on the present appellant filed a suit for eviction of the respondent-tenant on the grounds of his bona fide need, default in payment of rent and the tenant having acquired an alternative vacant premises. While the appellant suit was pending the respondent-tenant was delivered possession of his acquired house. The IInd Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Division decreed the suit of the appellant on the grounds that the respondent-tenant was a defaulter and that the respondent-tenant has acquired another suitable vacant accommodation. The respondent-tenant filed an appeal in the Court of IInd Addl. District Judge, Kolhapur. The Second Additional District Judge, reversed the finding of the trial Court relating to the ground of default, holding that the t





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top