SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. VENKATASWAMI AND SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI, JJ.
Dinesh Kumar Kartike, Appellant
VERSUS
State of M.P. and others, Respondents.
Criminal Appeal No. 180 of 1999 (arising out of S.L.P. (Cri) No. 3890 of 1998), D/- 15-2-1999.
Confiscation - Forest Produce - Interpretation of S. 19(1)(b) of the Madhya Pradesh Van Upaj (Vyapar Vaniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1969
Fact of the Case:
The appellant challenged an order of confiscation of a truck bearing No. MPQ 6789 under S. 19(1)(b) of the Madhya Pradesh Van Upaj (Vyapar Vaniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1969.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the concerned Forest Officer to consider the release of the confiscated truck under S. 19(1)(b) of the Act and pass appropriate orders.
Issues: Interpretation of S. 19(1)(b) of the Madhya Pradesh Van Upaj (Vyapar Vaniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1969
Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the Forest Officer had not considered the enabling provision of S. 19(1)(b) of the Act and directed the officer to take it into account for the release of the confiscated truck.
Final Decision: The appeal was disposed of accordingly with no orders as to costs.
JUDGMENT :- Leave granted.
2. After hearing the counsel on both sides and after going into the facts, we are of the view that the following order would meet the ends of justice.
3. The appellant challenges an order of confiscation of truck bearing No. MPQ 6789. Notice was issued by this Court on 16-11-1998 calling upon the respondent to show cause why appropriate order in terms of S. 19(1)(b) of the Madhya Pradesh Van Upaj (Vyapar Vaniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1969 should not be passed. Section 19(1)(b) of the Act reads as follows :-
"19. Composition of offences :- (1) The State Government may, by notification, empower a Forest Officer -
(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(b) when any property other than a specified forest produce has been seized as liable to confiscation, to release the same on payment of the value thereof as estimated by such officer."
4. On a perusal of the SLP paper book, we find that the concern Forest Officer had not focussed his attention to the enabling provision of S. 19(1)(b) of the Act. We therefore, direct the concerned Forest Officer to consider the question of release of the truck already confiscated under S. 19(1)(b) of the Act and pass appropriate orders in the facts and circumstances of the case. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. No orders as to costs.
Order accordingly.
FOR CITATION : AIR 2000 SC 3633(1)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.