D.P.WADHWA, S.SAGHIR AHMAD
High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Through Registrar – Appellant
Versus
Sarnam Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S. SAGHIR AHMAD, J.
(1) LEAVE granted.
(2) SARNAM Singh (respondent No. 1, who shall hereinafter be referred to as respondent, was compulsorily retired from service by order dated 12/11/1997 passed by the State government on the recommendation of the High court which itself, incidentally, is the appellant before us.
(3) THIS court in All India Judges Association v. Union of India, JT 1991 (4 SC 285 = 1992 1 SCC 119, had issued certain directions for improvement of the service conditions of the members of the subordinate judiciary in the country. The Union of India and various States thereafter filed a Review Petition which was considered and disposed of by this court on 24/08/1993 by Judgment since reported as All India Judges Association and Ors. v. Union of India & Ors., It may be pointed out that by the earlier Judgment in the main case of All India Judges Association (supra), one of the directions related to the enhancement of superannuation age of all the subordinate Judicial Officers upto 60 years. This question was also considered in the Review Petition and while rejecting the contention of the Union of India and other States that
All India Judges Association and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
State Bank of India and Ors. v. Kashi Nath Kher and Ors.
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Yamuna Shanker Mishra
Swatantra Singh v. State of Haryana
Union of India v. N.R. Banerjee
Rajat Baran Roy and Ors. v. State of W.B. and Ors.
REFERRED : High court of Punjab and Haryana through R.G. v. Ishwar Chand Jain and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.