SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 412

L. M. SHARMA, M. M. DUTT, R. S. PATHAK
Registrar, High Court Of Madras – Appellant
Versus
R. Rajiah: K. Rajeswaran – Respondent


Advocates:
G.N.Rao, RAJENDRA CHAUDHARY, T.SHRIDHARN

Judgment

DUTT, J. :- These two appeals are directed against a common judgment of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court whereby, in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the High Court quashed the orders of compulsory retirement of the two respondents, Mr. R. Rajiah and Mr. K. Rajeswaran, who were then the District Munsifs.

2. The respondent, R. Rajiah, originally joined service as a Sub-Magistrate on 3-3-1965. On 6-1-1973, he was appointed a District Munsif in the Tamil Nadu State Judicial Service. While he was functioning as District Munsif, on 3-3-1980 the Registrar of the High Court, the appellant herein, sent a communication to the respondent Rajiah stating therein that he was being compulsorily retired from service in public interest with effect from 3-3-1980.

3. The other respondent, K. Rajeswaran, was also originally appointed a Sub-Magistrate in 1953. On 29-11-1971, he was appointed a District Munsif having been selected by the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission. On 22-2-1976, the High Court passed an order confirming him as District Munsif with effect from 1-1-1976. On 27-10-1976, the High Court passed an order compulsorily retir




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top