SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 230

ARIJIT PASAYAT, ARUN KUMAR
General Manager, Indian Overseas Bank – Appellant
Versus
Workmen, All India Overseas Bank Employees Union – Respondent


Judgment

Arijit Pasayat, J.—The Indian Overseas Bank (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Bank’) calls in question legality of view expressed in a judgment rendered by the Industrial Tribunal, Tamil Nadu, Chennai (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’) which was affirmed by learned Singh Judge of the Madras High Court. The judgment of the Division Bench is the subject-matter of challenge in this appeal.

2. The core question which falls for adjudication in this appeal is whether "jewel appraisers for loans" are to be treated as workers and are to be absorbed as part time clerical staff of the Bank. Stand of the appellant is that jewel appraisers are not employees of the bank and do not do any substantial work.

3. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows :

The bank on the basis of contracts had employed about 767 jewel appraisers mainly in the rural branches in the States of Tamil Nadu, Pondicherry, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and few branches in Bihar and Orissa. Bank advances agricultural loans to its constituents and also members of the staff. The All India Indian Overseas Bank Employees Union (in short the ‘Union’) raised a dispute taking the stand that the jewel appraiser





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top