SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 140

K.RAMASWAMY, M.M.PUNCHHI
Rattan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Lt. Governor – Respondent


( 1 ) COUNSEL for the parties are agreed that these cases are squarely covered by a decision of this court in Writ Petition Nos. 9609-10 of 1983, titled Niadar v. Delhi Administration decided on 29/09/1988. In terms thereof thus, we direct the Delhi Administration to absorb the petitioners in accordance with the prepared scheme for absorbing casual labourers, which scheme has been made effective from 1/10/1988. In terms of the scheme, any casual labourer who has worked for one year or more in the Horticulture Department shall be regularised within six months with effect from 1/10/1988 if such casual labourer is otherwise fit to be regularised under the scheme as regular employee. On that footing each casual labourer working in the department shall get salary or wages at the rate equivalent to the minimum salary paid to a regular employee in comparable post in the Horticulture Department.

( 2 ) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner has also contended that the expression salary or wages used in Niadar case and which has been used instantly also has given rise to a doubt in the department as to whether on regularisation minimum wage is to be paid or minimum salary to the regular employee

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top