SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 896

A.M.AHMADI, B.N.KIRPAL
I. Vikheshe Sema – Appellant
Versus
Hokishe Sema – Respondent


( 1 ) THE challenge in this appeal by special leave is to the decision of the Guwhati High Court whereby the election of the appellant to the Nagaland Legislative assembly was declared to be void on an Election Petition having been filed by respondent No. 1 who was one of the candidates in the said election.

( 2 ) ON 12-1-1993, elections to the Nagaland legislative Assembly were notified. The appellant and the respondent, along with three other candidates, contested the said elections from Dinapur Constituency No I. The result of the election for the said constituency, which was declared, was as follows:

( 3 ) ON the counting of the votes, as the appellant had secured the highest number of votes, he was declared the returned candidate.

( 4 ) THE respondent then filed an Election Petition under Section 81 read with Section 100 (1) (d) (iii) (iv) of the Representation of the People Act. 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) before the Guwahati High Court. The only ground on which the selection was challenged was that there had been improper reception of void votes which had materially affected the result of the returned candidate. Evidence was led to show that in the electoral rol
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top