RUMA PAL, VENKATARAMA REDDY
. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI – Respondent
Judgment
RUMA PAL, J.- M/s ITC Ltd. (hereafter referred to as the appellant) manufactures cigarettes. Prior to 1983 excise duty was leviable on cigarettes under Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (referred to as "the Act") at rates specified under Tariff Item 4 of the First Schedule to the Act. The dispute in this appeal relates to the excise duty payable by the appellant for the period 1983 to 1987 on the cigarettes manufactured by it. The resolution of this dispute lies primarily in the interpretation of two exemption a notifications, namely, Notification No. 36/83 dated 1-3-1983 (referred to hereafter as "the 1983 notification") and Notification No. 201185 dated 2-91985 (referred to hereafter as "the 1985 notification") issued under Rule 8(1)
of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (referred to as "the Rules") and Section 3(3) of the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957. The 1985 notification which replaced the 1983 notification was in b similar terms except that the rates of excise duty and the categories of the cigarettes entitled to be exempted were different. In substance, however, as far as the question of interpretation is concerne
AIR 1948 PC 3 : 1947 All U 620
(1969) 2 SCR 481: AIR 1970 SC 1173
(1969) 2 SCR 253: AIR 1970 SC 755
1966 Supp SCR 198: AIR 1967 SC 234
(1964) 2 SCR 888: (1964) 14 STC 742
(2004) 1 SCC 551 : (2003) 10 Scale 768
(1962) 1 SCR 574 : AIR 1961 SC 1457
(1963) 3 SCR 893: AIR 1963 SC 1062
(1985) 4 SCC 343: 1985 SCC (Tax) 670
(1986) 2 SCC 501 : 1986 SCC (Tax) 425
(1991) 2 SCC 443: 1991 SCC (Cri) 432
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.