SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1044

RUMA PAL, VENKATARAMA REDDY
. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI – Respondent


Judgment

RUMA PAL, J.- M/s ITC Ltd. (hereafter referred to as the appellant) manufactures cigarettes. Prior to 1983 excise duty was leviable on cigarettes under Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (referred to as "the Act") at rates specified under Tariff Item 4 of the First Schedule to the Act. The dispute in this appeal relates to the excise duty payable by the appellant for the period 1983 to 1987 on the cigarettes manufactured by it. The resolution of this dispute lies primarily in the interpretation of two exemption a notifications, namely, Notification No. 36/83 dated 1-3-1983 (referred to hereafter as "the 1983 notification") and Notification No. 201185 dated 2-91985 (referred to hereafter as "the 1985 notification") issued under Rule 8(1)

of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (referred to as "the Rules") and Section 3(3) of the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957. The 1985 notification which replaced the 1983 notification was in b similar terms except that the rates of excise duty and the categories of the cigarettes entitled to be exempted were different. In substance, however, as far as the question of interpretation is concerne






















































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top