SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1254

B.N.SRIKRISHNA, SHIVARAJ V.PATIL
OM PRAKASH SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
M. P. AUDYOGIK KENDRA VIKAS NIGAM – Respondent


ORDER

1. Certain extent of land in three villages was sought to be acquired pursuant to a notification issued under Section 4 read with Section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 ("the Act" for short). The said notification reads thus:

"Part 1 M.P. Gazette dated 12-10-1984-1189Bhind dated 26-9-1984

S. No. Court Land - Sampadan - 1984-20472-75. Because the State Government feels that land described in columns 1 to 6 of the attached Schedule are needed for the public purpose mentioned in column 6 of the Schedule or likely to be needed, therefore in compliance with Section 4 sub-section (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (S. No. 1, San 1894) all the connected persons are hereby notified. The State Government authorised the officer mentioned in column 55 of the Schedule for using the power in this regard mentioned under Section 4(2). The State Government also directed that provision of Section 5-A will not be applicable to this land, because in his opinion the provision of Section 17 sub-section (1) is applicable to this land: .

SEHEDULE

Description of Land

DistrictTehsilCity/VillageApproxi mate area (hectare)Authorised

Officer under Section 4(2) Description of public purpose

BhindGoha































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top