SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 84

K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, P.VENKATARAMA REDDI, S.RAJENDRA BABU
Neelu Arora – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Judgment

RAJENDRA BABU, J.

( 1 ) THESE petitions are offshoot of a scheme framed by this Court in Sharwan Kumar etc. etc. v. Director General of Health Services and another etc. etc. . 1993 (3) SCC 332 prescribing the procedure to complete the process of allotment of 15 per cent of All India quota for admission to MBBS/bds courses in various colleges in the country by Sept. each year. The said Scheme was modified pursuant to an order made in I. A. No, 10 of 2000 in WP (C) No. 443 of 1992 the dates fixed stand altered as indicated therein, but we are not concerned with the same in these proceedings. The last date for receipt of vacancy position is fixed as Sept. of each year and the IInd round of counselling is proposed to be taken during the period fixed therein.

( 2 ) NOW in these petitions, it is contended that the Ilnd round of counselling for the All-India quota seats which was scheduled to be held have neither been held as the Pre-Medical Test (PMT) is not conducted nor counselling for the seats under the State quota is completed.

( 3 ) THIS Court in Dr. Pradeep Jain and others, etc. etc. v. Union of India and others, etc. etc. , 1984 (3) SCC 654 and Dr. Dinesh Kumar and others





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top