SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1764

B.N.AGARWAL, G.B.PATTANAIK
UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION – Appellant
Versus
JAGANNATH MISHRA – Respondent


( 1 ) THE Union Public Service Commission (for short "upsc") is the appellant against the impugned judgment of the Division Bench of the Patna high Court affirming the judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal (for short "the Tribunal" ). The respondent, Shri Jagannath Mishra, was a candidate for Indian Engineering Service during the year 1995 and he had appeared in the written test. The examiner, while examining the answer papers in Civil Engineering Paper II (Conventional), reported the fact that the person having Roll No. 006179 is suspected to have copied from the person having Roll No. 006178 and that Shri Mishra was having Roll No. 006178. In view of the aforesaid report of the examiner, UPSC got the papers examined by an Expert Committee, which Committee also reported that the candidate bearing Roll No. 006179 has copied from the candidate having roll No. 006178 and the latter has helped and connived in such copying. UPSC, therefore, issued show-cause notice to both the candidates, namely, one having Roll No. 006178 and the other having Roll No. 006179 indicating thereunder that the person having Roll No. 006179 has copied from the person having Roll No. 006178 and the




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top