K.T.THOMAS, R.P.SETHI
State Of H. P. – Appellant
Versus
SATYA DEV SHARMA – Respondent
( 1 ) WE are disposing of all these criminal appeals by this common judgment as it is convenient and advantageous to deal with all these together. They relate to three different criminal cases charge-sheeted before the Court of Special Judge, Shimla, established for trial of offences under the prevention of Corruption Act.
( 2 ) IN each of these three cases, officials of the State Government were arrayed along with private persons for facing charge for offences under section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 218, 379, 467, 468, 471, 419 of the Indian Penal Code, besides Section 33 of the Indian forest Act and also Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. During the pendency of the trial of these cases, some of the accused arrayed have died and the criminal proceedings became abated in respect of those persons. The trial proceeded as against the remaining accused and ultimately the trial Judge convicted the accused in all the three cases principally under section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and also for different other counts of offences linked to criminal conspiracy. All of them were sentenced to different terms of imprisonment under different cou
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.