SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 8

A.V.VARADARAJAN, D.A.DESAI, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
WORKMEN – Appellant
Versus
HINDUSTAN LEVER LTD. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

D. A. DESAI, J.

( 1 ) IF solemn agreements proposed by the employer and readily acceded to by the workmen and holding the forte for over a quarter of a century are crudely disowned compelling the workmen to knock at the door of the apex Court for removing the road-block in the access to justice set up by preliminary objection of technical nature, industrial peace and harmony chanted by the employer would be not merely an empty mantra but a futile exercise of chasing a mirage and unfortunately that is the situation here.

( 2 ) HINDUSTAN Lever Ltd. , a multi-national company, respondent herein addressed a communication dated 24/01/1957 recording the outcome of mutual deliberations, between the Hindustan Lever Ltd. (employer for short) and the Hindustan Lever Mazdoor Sabha (union for short) recognised representative union of the workmen employed by the employer. The relevant portion may be extracted:"ex. W-2 24/01/1957the President,hindustan Lever Mazdoor Sabha,

( 3 ) WE agree that for all matters of an all-India nature, we will communicate with the Personnel Director. As for the other points raised by you, we agree to follow the procedure, as far as legally permissible.

( 4 ) L























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top