SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 472

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CHANDRAN @ SURENDRAN
VERSUS
STATE OF KERALA
DECIDED ON: August 28, 1990

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 449, 457, 458, 392, 397, 307, 302 and 34 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 313 – District is at northern end of Kerala State and adjoining Karnataka State house was a small one consisting of two rooms and one verandah with two doors on both walls of house were such that one could climb over and make entry night as usual deceased Gopalakrishna took their beds in verandah and deceased Pushpa slept inside. Pushpa was wearing gold ear studs and nose stud was wearing a wrist watch two appellants residing in a border village in Karnataka State Talappaddi came to the scene house taking which was lying in courtyard situated from scene battered PW 8 and Gopalakrishna with and removed – Held, Risk of repetition we may state at this juncture that explanation offered by two appellants for presence of finger prints on their finger prints were taken on two glass pieces under compulsion non-explanation for taking these two appellants into police custody long after their arrest leaves an impression that all are well with prosecution mentioned that photographer who took photographs of finger prints was not available for examination evidence of itself is free from any infirmity unable to sustain the conviction of these two appellants on opinion as we have entertained a lurking suspicion in our mind about manner in which evidence had been obtained as indicated above. Further it is highly hazardous to rely on these two scanty pieces of circumstantial evidence which are brought on record in a very unsatisfactory and loathsome manner and which lack guarantee to inspire confidence – Appeals are allowed accordingly.

JUDGMENT

S. RATNAVEL PANDIAN, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals are preferred by the two appellants who were jointly tried before the Court of Session, Kasargod in Sessions Case No. 83 of 1986 under seven charges framed under Sections 449, 457, 458, 392, 397, 307 and 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code on the allegations that on 11-1-1986 after sunset and before sunrise in furtherance of their common intention committed criminal trespass by entering into the building belonging to PW 7 (Parvathi Amma) and brutally attacked Pushpa and Gopalakrishna resulting in their death in the course of the commission of robbery and also caused injuries to PWs 7 and 8 by beating them with a spade. The case of the prosecution as unfolded from the evidence in brief is as follows:

( 2 ) PW 7, her son PW 8, daughter Pushpa (the deceased herein) and a relation by name Gopalakrishna (another deceased in this case) were residing in the house of PW 7 in Kudlu village, adjoining Kasargod town in Kasargod district. This district is at the northern end of Kerala State and adjoining the Karnataka State. The house was a small one consisting of two rooms and one verandah with two doors on both sides. The walls of the house were such that one could climb over, and make entry. On the night of 11/01/1986, as usual, PW 8 and the deceased Gopalakrishna took their beds in the verandah while PW 7 and deceased Pushpa slept inside. Pushpa was wearing gold ear studs (M. O. 2) and nose stud (M. O. 3 ). PW 8 was wearing a wrist watch (M. O. 1 ). These two appellants residing in a border village in Karnataka State, namely, Talappaddi came to the scene house taking M. O. 4 (a spade) which was lying in the courtyard of PW 6 situated 200 metres away, from the scene. They battered PW 8 and Gopalakrishna with M. O. 4 and removed M. O. 1 from PW 8. Thereafter they entered the room wherein the deceased Pushpa and PW 7 were sleeping questioning where they had kept their gold ornaments and money. PW 7 who woke up by then replied that there was no gold or money in the house except some coconuts in the courtyard. The appellants attacked PW 7 and Pushpa with M. O. 4 and removed M. Os 2 and 3 from the person of Pushpa and escaped through the back door. On receipt of the injuries, Pushpa succumbed at the spot.

( 3 ) ON the next morning at about 11. 00 a. m. , PW 2 a boy aged about ten years who used to deliver plantain leaves to PW 7 on" every Friday and Sunday came to the scene house and found PW 8 and Gopalakrishna lying injured on the verandah. He rushed to the house of PW 3, the elder daughter of PW 7 and informed her of what he had seen. They all came back to the scene house and found Gopalakrishna and PW 8 lying speechless in the verandah in a pool of blood. On opening the door, to her shock, PW 3 found PW 7 lying with bleeding injuries and Pushpa dead. She found MOs 2 and 3 from the person of Pushpa and M. O. I of PW 8 missing. Inside the house, the household articles and vessels were found strewn and glass splinters scattered. PW 3 sent PW 10 to fetch PW 1. By then a passing police jeep driven by PW 24 was stopped and PWs 7, 8 and Gopalakrishna were removed to the Government Hospital, Kasargode where they were admitted by PW 10, a Medical Officer. Thereafter, all the three injured were taken to the Government Wenlock Hospital, Mangalore where they were treated by PW 12. MEANWHILE, PW 1 came to the scene and went to the Kasargod Police Station where he gave a report Ex P 1 on the strength of which PW 27 (Head Constable) registered a case in Crime No. 14 of 1986 under Sections 449, 397 and 302, IPC against some unknown persons. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Crime Detachment, Kasargod (PW 33) took up investigation. He held inquest over the dead body of Pushpa and noticed MOs 4 to 24 lying at the scene. On a requisition from PW 33, the Finger Print Expert (PW 30) reached the scene and found certain glazed articles like Pooja vessel and broken glass pieces lying scatte
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top