SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 230

N.M.KASLIWAL, B.C.RAY
S. R. Nayak – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B. C. RAY, J.

( 1 ) ONE Mr. Haresh Jagtiani, a practising advocate of the High Court of Bombay and a policy-holder under the Life Insurance Corporation of India and also holder of units issued by the Unit Trust of India and Mr. Shamit Majumdar, a holder of shares and debentures of Larsen and Toubro Ltd. filed a Writ Petition being No. 2595 of 1989 in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay against the Union of India and others including the financial institutions questioning the legality and validity of the consent given. by the Controller of Capital Issues for the proposed issue of convertible secured debentures aggregating Rs. 820 crores by Larsen and Toubro Limited insofar as the said issue seeks to offer such convertible debentures to persons other than the existing shareholders and members and the employees of Larsen and Toubro Limited and praying for quashing the same as well as for a declaration that the transfer of 39 lakh shares of Larsen and Toubro Ltd. held by Unit Trust of India, Life Insurance Corporation of India, General Insurance Company and its subsidiaries to Trishna Investment and Leasing Ltd. through the instrumentality of BOB Fiscal Services Ltd. is arbit


































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top