S.RANGANATHAN, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
Narendra Kumar Maheshwari – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J. :— In these transferred writ petitions and one suit, we are concerned with the powers, functions and the role of the Controller of Capital Issues. By an order dated 9th September, 1988 this Court had directed that the four writ petitions and one civil suit i.e., W.P. No. 1791/88 pending before the Delhi High Court, W.P. No. 2708/88 pending before the Jaipur Bench of the Rajasthan High Court, W.P. No. 12176/88 pending before the Karnataka High Court. W. P. No. 4388/88 pending before the High Court of Bombay and Civil Suit No. 1172/88 pending before the Civil Judge. Junior Division Bench, Baroda, Gujarat, be transferred to this Court for disposal. It would be appropriate to deal with the facts of one of these, i.e. W. P. No. 1791/88, which was filed in Delhi High Court in T. C. No. 161/88. The other writ petitions and the suit raise more or less identical problems and issues on more or less same facts.
1A. The petitioner in that writ petition is one Narendra Kumar Maheshwari and the respondents are the Union of India, the Controller of Capital Issues, and Reliance Petro-chemicals Ltd. (RPL). The case of the petitioner is that he is an individual who is
referred to : G.J. Fernandez v. State of Mysore
R. Abdullah Rowther v. State Transport Appellate tribunal
Dy. Assistant Iron and Steel Controller v. L. Manekchand
Andhra Industrial Works v. CCI
K.M. Shanmugam v. S.R.V.S. Pvt. Ltd.
considered : Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India
Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. (P) Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.