A.M.AHMADI, B.L.HANSARIA, SUHAS C.SEN
CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS – Appellant
Versus
JAGANNATH MARUTI KONDHARE – Respondent
JUDGMENT
HANSARIA, J.
( 1 ) TWO questions in the main need our determination in this batch of appeals which are by the Chief Conservator of Forests, State of Maharashtra. The first and foremost question is whether Forest Department of the State Government is an "industry" within the meaning of section 2 (j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter the Central Act), which definition has been adopted by the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (for short the State Act ). We shall have then to address ourselves to the question whether in the cases at hand the employer, namely the State Government, had indulged in unfair labour practice visualised by item 6 of Schedule IV of the State Act, as alleged by the respondents before the Industrial Court, Pune/ahmednagar. If these questions would be answered in affirmative, we would be required to consider without the directions given by the aforesaid Industrial Courts need our interference.
( 2 ) BEFORE applying our mind to the first question, it would be apposite to mention that this point had not been before the Industrial Court and it is because of this that the High Court, on b
relied on : Corpn. of the City of Nagpur v. Employees
Corpn. of the City of Nagpur v. Employees
University of Delhi v. Ram Nath
followed : Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa
relied on : State of Haryana v. Piara Singh
distinguished : Delhi Development Horticulture Employees Union v. Delhi Admit.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.