SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 374

M.P.THAKKAR, V.KHALID
KARNATAKA STATE TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. – Appellant
Versus
KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE tribunal – Respondent


Judgment

CHINNAPPA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) SPECIAL leave granted in all the cases.

( 2 ) THESE appeals raise common questions of law and may therefore, be disposed of by a common judgment. In exercise of its powers under S. 63 (7) of the Motor Vehicles Act, the Central Government specified 50 as the number of all India Tourist Vehicle Permits which may be granted by the Karnataka State Transport Authority. By S. 24 of Amending Act 47 of 1978, a proviso to S. 63 (7) was introduced. We are concerned in these appeals with the vires and interpretation of this proviso. By the time the proviso came into force. 36 permits had been granted by the Karnataka State Transport Authority and 14 remained to be granted. There were as many as 495 applications for the grant of these 14 permits. By an order dated 1/02/1984, the Supreme Court directed the Karnataka State Transport Authority to dispose of these applications. The State Transport Authority, by its proceedings dated 30/04/1984, granted 11 out of the 14 permits to the Karnataka State Tourism Development Corporation, one permit to the Indian Tourism Development Corporation and two permits to the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation. A number of







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top