J.S.VERMA, SUHAS C.SEN, S.P.BHARUCHA
CH. RAMALINGA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER – Respondent
JUDGMENT
BHARUCHA, J.
( 1 ) THESE are appeals by special leave against the judgment and order of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh whereby the High Court set aside the arbitration award in respect of Claims 2, 3, 7, 8 and 12 and modified the award in respect of Claims 5, 6, 13 and 14. The claims were made by the appellant, a contractor, against the respondents, officers of the state Government, in respect of an excavation contract for 11. 711 km to 13. 287 km of Darsi Branch Canal for an amount of Rs 50,89,342.
( 2 ) TWO issues were raised before the High Court, and they are raised before this Court, namely, (i) whether the petition filed by the respondents to set aside the award under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act was barred by time, and (ii) whether the award was vitiated in regard to certain claims.
( 3 ) THE award was made on 29-7-1985. It was sent by the arbitrator to the court on 31-7-1985 and was received by the Court at 12 noon on 5-8-1985. It is the case of the appellant that his advocate informed the Additional government Pleader in writing of the receipt of the award on 5-8-1985. On 7-8-1985, the Court issued notice of the award and it was received by the respo
Nilkantha Sidramappa Ningashetti v. Kashinath Somanna Ningashetti
Indian Rayon Corpn. Ltd. v. Raunaq and Co. (P) Ltd.
Sudarsan Trading Co. v. Govt. of Kerala
Secy., Irrigation Deptt., Govt. of Orissa v. G.C. Roy
Referred to : Food Corpn. of India v. E.Kuttappan
Jajodia (Overseas) (P) Ltd. v. Industrial Development Corpn.of Orissa Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.