LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA, ARIJIT PASAYAT
Naveen Chandra – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttaranchal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Arijit Pasayat, J. - Leave granted.
2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Uttaranchal High Court dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant while allowing the appeals filed by two others i.e. parents of the appellant. Appellant was convicted for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, (in short the IPC) read with Section 34 of the IPC. While the appellant was awarded death sentence, the other two were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. All the three accused persons were convicted for offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC. In view of the award of death sentence a reference was made to the High Court for confirmation in terms of Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the Code). By the impugned judgment the High Court directed acquittal of accused Smt. Kamla Devi and accused Sh. Nanda Ballabh and the death sentence was converted to life imprisonment and the appeal filed by the present appellant was partly allowed.
3. The background facts in a nutshell are as follows:
All the three accused came to be tried by the Sessions Judge, Bages
Sekar alias Raja Sekharan v. State represented by Inspector of Police, T.N.
Babulal Bhagwan Khandare and Anr. V. State of Maharashtra
Munshi Ram and Ors. v. Delhi Administration
State of Gujarat v. Bai Fatima
Lakshmi Singh v. State of Bihar
State of U.P. v. Mohd. Musheer Khan
Mohinder Pal Jolly v. State of Punjab
Butta Singh v. The State of Punjab
REFERRED TO : Kikar Singh v. State of Rajasthan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.