2006(9) Supreme 712
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From Jharkhand High Court)
Arijit Pasayat and Lokeshwar Singh Panta, JJ.
Minor Sunil Draon Tr. Guardian & Ors. - Appellants
versus
C.B.S.E. & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 4908/2006
(Arising out of SLP (C) No. 11820 of 2006)
Decided on 13-11-2006
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellants : Arun Jaitley, Sr. Advocate, Ajit Kumar Sinha, G.R. Pandey, Ms. Rakhi Suman and Mukesh Sinha, Advocates.
For the Respondents : Tara Chandra Sharma, Ms. Neelam Sharma and Rajeev Sharma, Advocates.
Held : We would refer to the law settled by this Court in various Judgments to the effect that interim orders of the nature passed in the present case are detrimental to education and its efficient management. As a matter of course, such interim orders should not be passed, as they are aberrations and it is subversive of academic discipline.(Para 13)
Time and again, therefore, this Court had deprecated the practice of educational institution admitting the students without requisite recognition or affiliation. In all such cases the usual plea is the career of innocent children who have fallen in the hands of the mischievous designated school authorities.(Para 22)
(ii) Education - Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ Petition relating to students for appearing in CBSE Examination - Maintainability - Prayer for grant of affiliation of school pending determination - According to CBSE, school in gross violation of Affiliation Bye-Laws was admitting large number of students in secondary and senior secondary classes - Inspection Committee found that the said school was not in a position to accommodate a large number of candidates as has been sponsored by it for taking All India Secondary School Examination and Senior Secondary Examination - A large number of students had been sponsored for appearance though number of bonafide students was much less - School instead of removing the deficiencies communicated to them by CBSE, requested for a sympathetic consideration - School was informed by glaring irregularities committed - Initially Single Judge had permitted candidates to appear pursuant to interim order, subsequently writ petition was dismissed - Whether judgment passed by the High Court is sustainable - (Yes).
Held : As the factual scenario delineated against goes to show the school has shown scant regards to the requirements for affiliation and as rightly highlighted by learned counsel for the CBSE, the infraction was of very serious nature. Though the ultimate victims are innocent students that cannot be a ground for granting relief to the appellant. Even after filing the undertakings the School non-challantly continued the violations.(Para 22)
Students have suffered because of the objectionable conduct of the school. It shall be open to them to seek such remedy against School as is available in law, about which aspect we express no opinion.(Para 23)
JUDGMENT
Arijit Pasayat, J. - Leave granted.
2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Jharkhand High Court dismissing the Letters Patent Appeal which was filed by the Cambridge School Parents Association and another questioning legality of the judgment and order dated 15.6.2006 passed by a learned Single Judge in a Writ Petition. In the Writ Petition prayer was for a direction to the respondent-Central Board of Secondary Education (in short the CBSE) to allow the students to appear in the examination conducted by CBSE and to publish their results. The Writ Petition related to 159 students of Class X and 121 students of class XII of the Cambridge School, Tatisilwai, Ranchi for appearing in the examination which was scheduled to be held on 1st March, 2006. Though initially learned Single Judge had permitted candidates to appear pursuant to interim order dated 27.2.2006, subsequently the writ petition was dismissed on the ground that the school was not affiliated to the CBSE and, therefore, no direction sought for could be given. In the appeal filed under Clause 10 of Letters Patent, the view was endorsed.
3. In support of the appeal learned counsel for the appellants submitted that for no fault of theirs, the academic career of nearly 300 students is being jeopardized. Non-affiliation for some particular years has been highlighted by learned Single Judge and the Division Bench overlooking the facts that affiliation has been granted on 29.8.2006 for the academic session 2006-07 covering the period from 1.4.2006 to 31.3.2007.
4. In response, learned counsel appearing for CBSE and its functionaries submitted that the present appellants were proforma respondents before the High Court and the Cambridge School Parents Association purporting to be an unregistered Association of Parents of children studying in the said institution was the appellant. Further one of the proforma respondents was the appellant No. 2 before the High Court. It is pointed out that law is fairly well settled that students of non-affiliated schools cannot claim any relief on equitable ground. Any sympathy shown to the students of the unaffiliated and/or non-recognised institutions would be misplaced sympathy.
5. Certain facts which are undisputed need to be noted:
The respondent No. 4 the Cambridge School had applied for grant of affiliation in September 1994 and was granted affiliation for a period of three years i.e. with effect from 1.4.1994 to 31.3.1997. The school applied for upgradation to plus 2 stage and the school was accorded upgradation up to plus 2 stage for a period of three years from 1.4.1996 to 31.3.1999. The affiliation of the school at Secondary/Sr. Secondary level was further extended for a period of three years from 1.4.1999 to 31.3.2002 and thereafter up to 31.3.2005 subject to fulfillment of Examination Bye Laws and the Affiliation Bye Laws of CBSE. As per the Affiliation Bye-Laws of CBSE, the school applying for affiliation has to fulfill certain essential conditions. The relevant provisions relating to affiliation in the Bye Laws are as under:
(i)It is mandatory for a school affiliated to Board to follow the Examination Bye-Laws of the Board in toto;
(ii)No affiliated school shall endeavor to present the candidates who are not on its roll nor shall it present the candidates of its unaffiliated Branch/School to any of the Boards Examination.
(iii)If the Board has reasons to believe that an affiliated school is not following the Sub-section 1 & 2 of this Section, the Board may resort to penalties as prescribed hereunder.
(iv)Every affiliated school shall present a list of number of students and their particulars in respect of Classes IX, X, XI & XII at the time of beginning of an academic session.
6. According to the respondent CBSE, the school in gross violation of Affiliation Bye-Laws was admitting large number of students in the secondary and senior secondary classes without providing support in ter
A.R.Christians Medical Educational Society v.Govt. of A.P.
Krishna Priya Ganguly v. University of Lucknow
Central Board of Secondary Education v. Nikhil Gulati
C.B.S.E. and Anr. v. P.Sunil Kumar and Ors
Referred to : Regional Officer, CBSE v. Sheena Pethambaran
State of Tamil Nadu v. St, Joseph Teachers Training Institute
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.