ARIJIT PASAYAT, S.H.KAPADIA
Kalegura Padma Rao – Appellant
Versus
The State Of A. P. Rep. by the Public Prosecutor – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J.—Leave granted.
3. Appellant along with 14 others was convicted for offences punishable under Sections 148, 448 read with Section 149, Section 302 read with Section 149 and Section 324 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the ‘IPC’).The III Additional Sessions Judge, Karimnagar found all the accused persons guilty of the charged offences. For the offence under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC each of the accused persons was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- each with default stipulation. Similarly, for the offences relatable to Sections 148, 448, 149 and 324 IPC different sentences were imposed. In appeal, the High Court confirmed the conviction and sentence as imposed by the Trial Court on the present appellants and accused nos. 7 to 9, 12 and 13. The High Court directed acquittal of rest of the accused persons of all charges.
3. The factual position in a nutshell is as follows :
PW-1 is the wife, PW-2 is the father, PW-3 is the mother, PW-4 is the brother and PW-5 is the sister-in-law of Pogula Jasan (hereinafter referred to as the ‘deceased’). The accused, deceased and the materia
Rajwant Singh v. State of Kerala
State of Punjab v. Jagir Singh
Guli Chand and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan
State of A.P. v. Rayavarapu Punnaya
S. Sudershan Reddy v. State of A.P.
Virsa Singh v. State of Punjab
Abdul Waheed Khan alias Waheed and Ors. v. State of A.P.
Sucha Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab
Dalip Singh and Ors. v. The State of Punjab
Nisar Ali v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.