S.B.SINHA, MARKANDEY KATJU
P. Mohanan Pillai – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.B. Sinha, J. — Leave granted.
2. Oil Palm India Limited is a Government Company (for short, ‘the Company). The Union of India and the State of Kerala are its shareholders. It is indisputably a ‘State’ within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India. Appellant herein was appointed as a worker in the services of the Company in the year 1982. 12 posts of Watchman/Messenger/Attender fell vacant. Recruitment to the said post is not governed by any statutory rules. Admittedly, all the workmen who were in service of the Company were to be considered therefor. Applications having been invited for filling up of the said 12 posts, 253 persons applied therefor. A written test was conducted on 18.01.2001. Appellant herein stood first in the written examination. The said written examination was conducted by the Kerala State Productivity Council in terms of the resolution of the Board of Directors of the Company dated 13.06.2000. It is not in dispute that the written test was conducted for eliminating those who had failed to secure the minimum qualifying marks in the written test. It has also not been disputed that out of 253 applicants, only 197 appeared therein.
Jasvinder Singh v. State of J&K
Vijay Syal and Another v. State of Punjab & Others
Inder Parkash Gupta v. State of J&K and Others
The Manager, Govt. Branch Press and Another v. D.B. Belliappa
Punjab State Electricity Board v. Zora Singh and Others
Ashok Kumar Yadav v. State of Haryana
All India State Bank Officers’ Federation v. Union of India
K.K. Bhalla v. State of M.P. and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.