SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 463

S.B.SINHA, MARKANDEY KATJU
Commr. of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Distillers Co. LTD. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. Sinha, J. — Leave granted.

Respondent carries on business of arrack bottling, manufacture of industrial alcohol and their marketing. He obtained a licence from the State of Karnataka for the aforementioned purposes in terms of the provisions of Karnataka Excise Act, 1965. Indisputably, the matter relating to manufacture and bottling of arrack is governed by the said Act and the rules framed thereunder by the State of Karnataka known as Karnataka Excise (Manufacturing & Bottling of Arrack) Rules, 1987 (for short “the Rules”). Rule with which we are concerned herein is sub-Rule (3) of Rule 14 which reads as under:-

“(3) Arrack after blending shall be matured in such manner and for such period as may be specified by the Commissioner from time to time.”

3. The Commissioner of Excise, however, issued a circular stating:

“It is hereby specified that the arrack shall be matured in wooden vats for a minimum period of 15 days before bottling the same.”

4. A period of 15 days, thus, had been prescribed for the aforementioned purpose. A question, however, arose as to what would happen to the excise article, if for circumstances beyond one’s control, said directives cannot be carrie





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top