SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 590

R.V.RAVEENDRAN, TARUN CHATTERJEE
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
A. S. Gangoli – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R. V. RAVEENDRAN, J.—

This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment dated 14.3.2001 passed by the Bombay High Court in W.P. No.2973 of 1989.

2.Respondents 1 to 10 were commissioned into Indian Air Force (IAF for short) during 1963 to 1967. By the year 1987, they had put in more than 20 years of service and had reached the rank of either Group Captain or Wing Commander.

3.The Government of India, by Circulars dated 17.3.1986 and 19.2.1987 of the Defence Ministry, read with O.M. dated 6.3.1985 of Finance Ministry permitted pro-rata pensionary benefits to officers of defence services on their immediate absorption in Central Public Enterprises. As there was a surplus of officers in the middle seniority level, IAF came up with schemes from time to time enabling officers to take premature retirement voluntarily and join public sector undertakings (‘PSUs’ for short) and autonomous bodies, without losing the pensionary benefit relating to the IAF service. One such scheme notified on 1.4.1986 invited the officers in the age group of 40 to 47 years to retire voluntarily and join M/s. Vayudoot Ltd.- a public sector undertaking. Several IAF officers including Respondents 1










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top