A.R.LAKSHMANAN, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA
Paramjeet Singh Patheja – Appellant
Versus
ICDS LTD. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. AR. Lakshmanan, J.
This appeal was filed against the impugned interlocutory judgment and order dated 19.3.2003 passed in Notice of Motion No. 72/2002 in Notice No. 180 of 2001 by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay whereby the reference made by the learned single Judge with regard to the question of law was answered against the appellant herein.
The appellant herein is Paramjeet Singh Patheja(guarantor), judgment debtor and the respondent is ICDS Ltd, a Company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956.
On 30.10.1998 the said company was registered with the Board of Industrial Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) under the provisions of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special provisions) Act, 1995. The appellant was a party to arbitration proceedings initiated by the respondents to recover amounts alleged to be due and payable from one Patheja Forgings and Auto Parts Manufactures Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the company). The appellant was sought to be sued in his purported capacity as guarantor of the dues of the said company.
On 09.03.2000, a letter was sent informing the Arbitrators that the company has been registered under section 15 of the Sick I
REFERRED TO : Srivastava v. K.K. Modi Investments and Financial Services
T.B. Guddalli v. Registrar or Co-op. Societies
Sidharth Srivastava v. K.K. Modi Investment and Financial Service P.Ltd.
M/s B.R. Enterprises v. State of U.P. and Ors.
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Hansrajbhai V. Kodala
The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall
Commissioner of Income-tax, New Delhi v. M/s East West Import and Export (P) Ltd., Jaipur
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.