SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 377

A.R.LAKSHMANAN, ALTAMAS KABIR
CRANE BETEL NUT POWDER WORKS – Appellant
Versus
COMMR. OF CUSTOMS & CENTRAL EXCISE, TIRUPATHI – Respondent


Judgment

ALTAMAS KABIR, J. - Leave granted.

2. The appellant Company is engaged in the business of marketing betel nuts in different sizes after processing them by adding essential/non - essential oils, menthol, sweetening agent, etc. Initially, the appellant cleared the goods under Chapter Sub - Heading 2107 of the Central Excise Tariff and was paying duty accordingly. However, the appellant filed a revised classification declaration under Rule 173 - B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, with effect from 17 - 7 - 1997, claiming classification of its product under Chapter Sub - Heading 0801.00 of the Central Excise Tariff. It was contended that the crushing of betel nuts into smaller pieces with the help of machines and passing them through different sizes of sieves to obtain goods of different sizes/grades and sweetening the cut pieces did not amount to manufacture in view of the fact that mere crushing of betel nuts into smaller pieces did not bring into existence a different commodity which had a distinct character of its own.

3. The Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Guntur Division, who was the adjudicating authority, did not accept the contention of the appellant upon ho














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top