P.N.BHAGWATI, R.S.PATHAK, V.D.TULZAPURKAR
Deputy Commissioner Of Sales Tax (Law) Board Of Revenue (Taxes) , Ernakulam – Appellant
Versus
Pio Food Packers – Respondent
JUDGMENT
PATHAK, J. :— This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the Kerala High Court holding that the turnover of pineapple fruit purchased for preparing pineapple slices for sale in sealed cans is not covered by Section 5-A (1) (a) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963.
2. The respondent, Messrs. Pio Food Packers ("the assessee"), carries on the business of manufacturing and selling canned fruit besides other products. In its return for the year 1973-74 under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 the assessee claimed that a turnover of Rs. 3,84,138-89 representing the purchase of pineapple fruit was not covered by Section 5-A (1) (a) of the Act. It was asserted that the pineapple was converted into pineapple slices, pineapple jam, pineapple squash and pineapple juice. Section 5-A (1) (a) of the Act provides :
"5-A. Levy of purchase tax-
(1) Every dealer who, in the course of his business, purchases from a registered dealer or from any other person any goods the sale or purchase of which is liable to tax under this Act, in circumstances in which no tax is payable under Section 5, and either-
(a) consumes such goods in the manufacture of other goods for sal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.