S.B.SINHA, HARJIT SINGH BEDI
All Cargo Movers (I) Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Dhanesh Badarmal Jain – Respondent
judgment
S.B. Sinha, J. —
1.Leave granted.
2.The parties hereto entered into a contract of carriage. First Respondent approached the appellants which are companies registered and incorporated under the Indian Companies Act for delivery of six consignments valued at US $ 98,715.29 to the original consignee, M/s. Universal Apparels (EPZ), Mombassa, Kenya. By reason of a fax message, Appellants asked their counterparts in Mombassa, Kenya (Walford Meadows) to confirm delivery of consignment asking it to see that the cargo is delivered only against presentation of original Bills of Lading. The goods in question were said to have been delivered by the agent of the petitioner to the original consignee but the same allegedly was rejected on the ground of being inferior in quality. Goods are said to have been delivered to M/s. Fashionette Industries Ltd. Complainant-Respondent issued a notice to the accused persons as also the aforementioned Walford Meadows and M/s. Universal Apparels stating :
“That with utter disregard to the procedures and practice prevalent internationally, and being fully conscious of the consequences of delivering the consignments without production of the Bills of Lading
G. Sagar Suri & Anr. v. State of U.P.. (2000) 2 SCC 636 – Relied upon. [Para 17]
Hira Lal Hari Lal Bhagwati v. CBI, New Delhi
Hira Lal Hari Lal Bhagwati v. CBI, New Delhi
Indian Oil Corporation v. NEPC India Ltd. (2006) 6 SCC 736 – Relied upon. [Para 20]
Anil Mahajan v. Bhor Industries Ltd. (2005) 10 SCC 228 – Relied upon. [Para 19]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.