SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 1320

HARJIT SINGH BEDI, S.B.SINHA
C. Natrajan – Appellant
Versus
Ashim Bai – Respondent


judgment

S.B. Sinha, J. —

1. Leave granted.

Appellant herein filed a suit against the respondents claiming, inter alia, for the following reliefs :

“(a)For declaration of plaintiffs title to the suit property;

(b)For consequential injunction, restraining the defendants, their men, agents, servants, etc. from in any manner interfering with the plaintiffs peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property.

(c)Alternatively, if for any reason this Honourable court comes to a conclusion that the plaintiff is out of possession, for recovery of vacant possession of the suit property;

(d)Directing the defendant to pay the cost of this suit.”

2.The said suit was filed in the year 2001. Cause of action of the said suit was said to have arisen in 1994 when the defendants allegedly trespassed over the suit property. Respondent on or about 8.8.2001 filed an application under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure praying for rejection of the plaint on the premise that the suit was barred by limitation, inter alia, stating :

2.I beg to submit that the Respondent/Plaintiff in the plaint paragraph 4 with respect to the question of limitation has averred that he had the knowledge of the mi









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top