ARIJIT PASAYAT, AFTAB ALAM
Indu Nissan Oxo Chemicals Ind. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Jamshedpur – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.—
1.Leave granted.
2.Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by the High Court of Gujarat dismissing the writ petitions filed by the appellant.
3.Challenge before the High Court was to the order dated 10.1.2006 passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (in short ‘CESTAT’) directing deposit of rupees two crores as a condition precedent for entertaining the appeal. It is to be noted that the total amount of penalty imposed was Rs.10,00,00,000/-. The dispute relates to classification of the product imported by the appellant and consequential benefits claimed by it under various Notifications issued by the Director General of Foreign Trade. The customs authorities did not accept the stand of the appellant about its classification. The levy of penalty was challenged by way of appeal before the CESTAT. It was accompanied by an application seeking waiver of the penalty imposed by the Commissioner of Customs (in short the ‘Commissioner’).
4.After hearing the parties, the CESTAT inter alia noted as follows :
“The learned Advocate for the applicants contends in one hand that a letter of Ms. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. written by its Assi
Silliguri Municipality and Ors. v. Amalendu Das and Ors. (AIR 1984 SC 653). (Para 11)
M/s Samarias Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. S. Samuel and Ors. (AIR 1985 SC 61). (Para 11)
Assistant Collector of Central Excise v. Dunlop India Ltd. (AIR 1985 SC 330). (Para 11)
S. Vasudeva v. State of Karnataka and Ors. (AIR 1994 SC 923). (Para 15)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.