SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 1559

Supreme Court Of India
G.M.INDIAN BANK - Appellant
Versus
R.RANI - Respondent
Appeal (Civil) 54 Of 2005
Decided On : 12/06/2007
.

Compliance with the directions for the constitution of the Committee for verifying the caste certificate as laid down in previous court decisions is crucial and cannot be overlooked.

Headnote:

Scheduled Tribe - Appointment dispute - Kumari Madhuri Patil (supra), Director of tribal Welfare, Government of A. P. vs. Laveti Giri and anr. (1995) 4 SCC 32, baswant vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. , JT 2000 (10) SC 280, sudhakar Vithal Kumbhare v. State of Maharashtra and ors. , (2004) 9 SCC 481 - The court discussed the constitution of the Committee for verifying the caste certificate and its compliance with the directions given in the case of Kumari Madhuri Patil (supra) and subsequent related cases.

Fact of the Case:

The private respondents were appointed in the banks against the vacancies of Scheduled tribe but were found not to belong to Konda Reddy Community after an enquiry. The High Court quashed the orders of termination and directed reinstatement.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court was justified in quashing the orders passed by the District Level Committee, State Level Committee, and the orders of termination. The direction for reinstatement was also upheld based on previous court decisions.

Issues: Validity of the constitution of the Committee, justification for quashing the orders, and reinstatement of the private respondents.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the constitution of the District Level committee was in infraction of the law laid down by the court in previous cases, and the defect could not have been cured by taking the matter in appeal to the State Level Committee. The direction for reinstatement was based on the same infirmity in the constitution of the Committee.

Final Decision: The appeals were dismissed, and the District Level Committee, now duly constituted by the State government, was directed to decide the matter afresh within a period of six months.

B. N. AGRAWAL, J.

( 1 ) LEAVE granted.

( 2 ) THE private respondents in these appeals were appointed in the banks against the vacancies of Scheduled tribe as they claimed themselves to be members of Konda reddy Community which is a Scheduled Tribe. Most of them were appointed by the Indian Bank but some of them by the state Bank of India. Subsequently it transpired that they did not belong to Konda Reddy Community, as such an enquiry was directed which was conducted by a District Level committee which found that they did not belong to Konda reddy Community and accordingly certificates granted in their favour were cancelled. In all the cases, except in Civil appeal No. 54/2005, the private respondents challenged the aforesaid decision of the District Level Committee before the state Level Committee which confirmed the same in most of the cases whereas in other cases matters remained pending before the State Level Committee. In the meantime, in accordance with the decisions of District Level Committee the services of private respondents were terminated which necessitated filing of the Writ Petitions before the High court, which have been allowed by different orders. In all the cases orders passed by the Committee cancelling the certificates and consequential orders of termination have been quashed and it has been directed that it would be open to the properly constituted Committee to hold fresh enquiry in accordance with law. In some of the Writ Petitions directions have been given for reinstatement also. In relation to payment of back-wages it has been directed in some of the writ Petitions that the same would abide the result of enquiry by a properly constituted Committee. In Civil Appeal no. 54/2005 against the order of single Judge when the matter was taken in appeal the same has been confirmed whereas in other cases no appeal was filed. Hence, these appeals by the Indian Bank as well as State Bank of India by special Leave.

( 3 ) LEARNED counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants in support of the appeals submitted that the High Court was not justified in holding that constitution of the Committee was not in accordance with the judgment rendered by this court in the case of Kumari Madhuri Patil and Anr. vs. Addl. Commissioner, Tribal Development and Ors. , [1994] 6 SCC 241 as the directions contained therein in relation to constitution of the Committee were mere guidelines. It was further submitted that even if there was any infirmity in the constitution of the District Level Committee, the order has been confirmed by the State Level Committee which was duly constituted, as such the High Court should not have interfered. It was also submitted that the High Court was not justified in directing the private respondents to be reinstated in service.

( 4 ) WE first proceed to consider the question as to whether the directions contained in the decision of this court in the case of Kumari Madhuri Patil (supra) were merely guidelines or law laid down by this Court. In the case of kumari Madhuri Patil (supra) after due consideration the court gave various directions. Direction number 4 in paragraph 13 at page 254 reads thus:

"4. All the State Governments shall constitute a Committee of three officers, namely, (I) an Additional or Joint Secretary or any officer higher in rank of the Director of the department concerned, (II) the director, Social Welfare/tribal welfare/backward Class Welfare, as the case may be, and (III) in the case of scheduled Castes another officer who has intimate knowledge in the verification and issuance of the social status certificates. In the case of the Scheduled Tribes, the research Officer who has intimate knowledge in identifying the tribes, tribal communities, parts of or groups of tribes or tribal communities. "

( 5 ) ACCORDING to aforesaid direction No. 4, the Committee for verifying the caste certificate shall be constituted of three persons, viz. , (I) an Administrative Officer, (II) the Direct





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top