B.N.AGARWAL, P.P.NAOLEKAR
G. M. INDIAN BANK – Appellant
Versus
R. RANI – Respondent
B. N. AGRAWAL, J.
( 1 ) LEAVE granted.
( 2 ) THE private respondents in these appeals were appointed in the banks against the vacancies of Scheduled tribe as they claimed themselves to be members of Konda reddy Community which is a Scheduled Tribe. Most of them were appointed by the Indian Bank but some of them by the state Bank of India. Subsequently it transpired that they did not belong to Konda Reddy Community, as such an enquiry was directed which was conducted by a District Level committee which found that they did not belong to Konda reddy Community and accordingly certificates granted in their favour were cancelled. In all the cases, except in Civil appeal No. 54/2005, the private respondents challenged the aforesaid decision of the District Level Committee before the state Level Committee which confirmed the same in most of the cases whereas in other cases matters remained pending before the State Level Committee. In the meantime, in accordance with the decisions of District Level Committee the services of private respondents were terminated which necessitated filing of the Writ Petitions before the High court, which have been allowed by different orders. In all the case
Director of Tribal Welfare v. Laveti Giri and Others
Madhuri Patil and Anr. vs. Addl. Commr., Tribal Development, Thane and Ors.
Baswant vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
REFERRED TO : Sudhakar Vithal Kumbhare v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Kumari Madhuri Patil and Anr. vs. Addl. Commissioner, Tribal Development and Ors.
Director of Tribal Welfare, Government of A.P. vs. Laveti Giri and Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.