SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 1480

S.B.SINHA, HARJIT SINGH BEDI
MANOHAR, SHANKAR NALE – Appellant
Versus
JAIPALSING, SHIVLALSING RAJPUT – Respondent


S. B. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) LEAVE granted.

( 2 ) APPLICABILITY of the provisions of Article 136 as contained in the schedule appended to the Limitation Act, 1963 is in question in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 26. 7. 2005 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench at Nagpur in writ Petition No. 5927 of 2004 affirming an order dated 26. 10. 2004 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division in Regular Darkhast No. 32 of 2001.

( 3 ) SHIVLALSING, predecessor-in-interest of the respondents filed a suit in the Court of Civil Judge, Junior Division, Malkapur. The said suit was marked as Regular Civil Suit No. 250/1965. It was dismissed on 24. 12. 1968. An appeal preferred thereagainst was also dismissed. However, a second appeal filed by the plaintiff-decree holder was allowed upon setting aside the judgment and decree of the Courts below, the operative portion whereof reads as under :

"for the reasons stated in the accompanying judgment, the court allows the appeal, sets aside the decrees of both the courts below dismissing the suit and instead. The court orders that the plaintiffs suit for possession of 32 gunthas area, as shown in th
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top