HARJIT SINGH BEDI, TARUN CHATTERJEE
G. M. ONGC, Shilchar – Appellant
Versus
ONGC Contractual Workers Union – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Harjit Singh Bedi, J. —
1. This appeal after special leave arises out of the following facts :
2. The appellant, the Oil and Natural Gas Commission (hereinafter called the “ONGC”) is engaged in the exploration for oil and natural gas. In 1997, the ONGC started its drilling operations in the district of Cachar and for that purpose engaged a large number of staff in various fields, initially through contractors. These employees later formed the ONGC Contractual Workers Union (hereinafter called the “Union”) which is the contesting respondent in this matter. The Union raised a dispute demanding the regularization of the services of its members. This demand was resisted by the ONGC and on the failure of conciliation proceedings, the State Government made a reference to the Industrial Tribunal.
3. The parties before the Industrial Tribunal filed their pleadings and also recorded their evidence. The Tribunal in its award dated 11th July 1994, held that the members of the Union were indeed the employees of the ONGC and a direction was accordingly issued that their services be regularized in a phased manner with pay and other allowances, as permissible to regular employees. This
R.K.Panda & Ors. vs. Steel Authority of India & Ors. (1994)5 SCC 304 – Relied upon. (Para 5)
Housing Board & Anr. vs. Manoj Shrivastava (2006) 2 SCC702 – Referred to. (Para 4)
Seema Ghosh vs. Tata Iron & Steel Co. (2006) 7 SCC 722 – Referred to. (Para 4)
Indian Drug & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs. Workmen
Gangadhar Pillai vs. Siemens Ltd. (2007) 1 SCC 533 – Referred to. (Para 4)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.