S.B.SINHA, DALVEER BHANDARI
Gangadhar Pillai – Appellant
Versus
Siemens LTD. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.B. Sinha, J. - Leave granted.
2. Respondent has its own Engineering and Field Service department which undertakes jobs of industrial project installation, erection, commissioning of electrical/ electronic equipments which are supplied by it or the same are directly brought by its clients at various projects/ sites as per their requirements.
3. The services of Respondent are utilized for the aforesaid work as a contractor which is a project/ site work required to be completed within the stipulated period, time and quality being the essence of the contract entered into by and between the parties.
4. Respondent used to engage temporary personnel in the category of skilled, semi-skilled and unskilled workers. Appellant had been appointed by Respondent on temporary basis for duration of the project/ site work and on completion thereof his services used to be terminated.
5. Indisputably, Appellant used to be employed almost on a regular basis since 1978. His services were availed by Respondent not only for its various projects in India but also in Iraq.
6. Procedure followed for availing the services of Appellant by Respondent had been that whenever such contract was obtaine
Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad, U.P. v. Anil Kumar Mishra and Others etc.
Buddhi Nath Chaudhary and Others v. Abahi Kumar and Others
State of Haryana v. Piara Singh
Referred to : M.P.Housing Board v. Manoj Shrivastava
Secretary, State of Karnataka and Others v. Umadevi
Haryana State Electronics Development Corporation Ltd. v. Mamni
Union of India and Others v. Ramchander and Another
Chief Conservator of Forests and Another v. Jagannath Maruti Kondhare and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.