SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 1048

ARIJIT PASAYAT, P.SATHASIVAM
State of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Kumar – Respondent


Judgment

Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J. —

1.Leave granted.

2.Challenge in this appeal is to the Order passed by a Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court summarily dismissing the Civil Writ Petition filed by the State. Challenge in the writ petition was to the award passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour court, U.T. Chandigarh in a reference made under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short the ‘Act’). The respondent claimed that he was working in the office of the Public Works Department B&R since December 1991 and continued to work upto 31st March, 1993. He claimed to have completed 240 days of service and to have drawn the salary. The allegation was that without any justifiable reason his services were terminated w.e.f. 31.3.1993. A civil suit was filed for mandatory injunction against the department. The Department took the view that the Civil Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit. Subsequently, demand notice was issued and the matter was referred to the Labour Court. The Labour Court found that the alleged termination was not sustainable. The Labour Court took the view that since the workman was engaged in December, 1991 and worked upto 31.1.1993















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top