SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 965

D. P. WADHWA, A. S. ANAND, RUMA PAL
State Of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Battan – Respondent


ORDER

This appeal by special leave has been filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh against refusal by the High Court to grant leave in an appeal against acquittal and, consequently, dismissing the appeal against acquittal.

2. Shorn of details, the prosecution case in brief is that on 17th of January, 1990 at about 8.00 a.m. when the deceased went towards river side for easing himself, the accused party armed with lathis and dandas arrived there and started assaulting him. On learning about the assault on their brother, Ramesh, Ramphal and Ram Nath (PWs) rushed to the spot and found that the accused were chasing Ramesh (deceased) and as soon as Ramesh had reached outskirts of the village, he was assaulted by the accused party and he fell down. When his brothers and some other prosecution witnesses tried to intervene, they were also given beating. On hearing noise, some other persons also were attracted to the spot, seeing whom the accused persons ran away. A first information report was lodged and after investigation, a charge-sheet was submitted against the accused party.

3. After recording the evidence, the learned trial Court on 4th April, 1991 acquitted the accused persons of the cha







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top