SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 1263

2008(6) Supreme 256
Supreme Court of india
(From Allahabad High Court)
Dr. Arijit Pasayat and P. Sathasivam, JJ.
Ram Pyare Mishra — Appellant
versus
Prem Shanker and Ors. — Respondents
Criminal Appeal No. 181 of 2001
with
Criminal Appeal No.182 of 2001
Decided on : 22-08-2008

Important Point
When the right to private defence is exceeded, the accused is guilty of offence punishable under Section 304 Part I IPC.

Headnote:(a)Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 96 and 97 – The burden of establishing the plea of self-defence is on the accused and the burden stands discharged by showing preponderance of probabilities in favour of that plea on the basis of the material on record. (Para 5)

       AIR 1968 SC 702; AIR 1975 SC 1478; AIR 1977 SC 2226; AIR 1979 SC 577; AIR 1979 SC 391 – Relied upon.

       (b)Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 96 and 97 – If the fact situation shows that in the guise of self-preservation, what really has been done is to assault the original aggressor, even after the cause of reasonable apprehension has disappeared, the plea of right of private-defence can legitimately be negatived – The right of self-defence is a very valuable right, and should not be construed narrowly.(Paras 9 and 10)

       AIR 1963 SC 612; AIR 1975 SC 87; (1996) 1 SCC 458; (2002) 8 SCC 354; AIR 1991 SC 1316; AIR 1971 SC 1857 – Relied upon.

       (c)Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 96 and 97 – Accused beaten by the villagers after they gravely injured the deceased – Evidence clearly showed that though at some point of time the exercise of right of private defence by the respondents existed, the same had been exceeded. (Paras 15 to 17)

       (2004)12 SCC 269; (2004)13 SCC 257 – Relied upon.

       Facts of the case :

       1.The accused respondents armed with knife and lathi arrived at the ‘Gotha’ of the Mohan Mishra (the ‘deceased’) and accused Hari Shanker started beating the deceased with lathi and also asked his brother Prem Shanker to kill him, whereupon Prem Shanker assaulted the deceased with knife.

       2.The witnesses succeeded in apprehending Prem Shanker along with the knife with which he had assaulted the deceased and Ramakant. Mohan Mishra died on the way to Police station.

       3.Trial Court found the evidence of eye witnesses to be credible, cogent and recorded conviction.

       4.In appeal, the High Court found substance in the plea of exercise of right of private defence and directed acquittal.

       Finding of the Court :

       Even though at some point of time the exercise of right of private defence by the respondents existed, the same had been exceeded.

       Result : Appeal partly allowed. Respondents convicted of offence punishable under Section 304 Part I IPC.

Judgment

Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J. —

1.Challenge in these appeals is to the Judgment of a Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court accepting the appeal filed by the respondents who were found guilty of offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the ‘IPC’). The High Court held that if on taking overall view of the case right of self defence is made out or looks probable from the evidence on record, that right should not be construed narrowly because the right of self defence is a very valuable right and it has a social purpose.

2.Background facts as projected by prosecution in a nutshell are as follows :

The incident occurred on 12.7.1978 at about 5.30 a.m. The respondents 1 and 2 are brothers and sons of Sheo Balak Misra. On the aforesaid date and time the accused respondents armed with knife and lathi respectively arrived at the ‘Gotha’ of the Mohan Mishra (hereinafter referred to as the ‘deceased’) and accused Hari Shanker started beating the deceased with lathi and also asked his brother Prem Shanker to kill him, whereupon Prem Shanker assaulted the deceased with knife. On hearing the cries of deceased, his brother R.P. Mishra (PW-1) who was washing his hands at the Hand Pump installed in the east of ‘Gotha’ of Ramakant Mishra, rushed to the scene of occurrence. The cries also attracted Ramakant Mishra (P.W.2), Suresh Mishra (P.W.4), Shiv Sahai and Vibhuti Mishra. Ramakant Mishra tried to rescue the deceased but he too was assaulted by Prem Shanker with knife. Deceased fell down on the ground. The witnesses succeeded in apprehending Prem Shanker along with the knife with which he had assaulted the deceased and Ramakant. However, accused Hari Shanker succeeded in making good his escape. Thereafter Ram Pyare Mishra and other witnesses proceeded to Police Station Kotwali along with Mohan Mishra and accused Prem Shanker on tractor trolley of Gangotri Mishra. Before they could reach police station, Mohan Mishra died on the way. R.P. Mishra (P.W.1) prepared F.I.R. (Ex. Ka. I) in his own handwriting and presented the same at Police Station Kotwali at 6.30 a.m. on the same day. Prem Shanker and blood stained knife, (Ex.1) recovered from him were handed over to police at the police station, in respect of which memo Ex. Ka. 2 were prepared by Moharrir (PW-6) who also prepared Check report and registered the case in general diary. S.I. Harsh Nath Singh (PW-5) was present at the police station when the F.I.R. was lodged. He took up investigation and recorded the statement of first information at the police station. S.I. Radhey Shyam Tewari conducted inquest on the dead body of Mohan Mishra, which had been brought to the police station by first informant and others. The dead body was then sent for postmortem examination with constable Ram Asrey and Rang Nath. After recording the statements of Shiv Sahai and Suresh Mishra (P.W.4), the Investigating Officer reached the place of occurrence along with first informant and witness Shiv Sahai. He made inspection of the scene of occurrence and prepared site plan Ex. Ka.13. The place where blood was found has been shown by letter ‘A’ in the site plan. Hari Shanker was arrested on the same day. Injured Ramakant Mishra was, however, interrogated on 13.7.1978 and after completing the investigation charge sheet Ex. Ka 15 was submitted against both the accused persons. Dr. Vermpal conducted autopsy on the dead body of Mohan Mishra on 12-7-78 at 12 noon and following ante mortem injuries were found.

1.Incised wound 2" 1/4" x skin deep on right side forehead 1" above the right eye brow and 1-1/2" away from right ear margins clean cut, gaping present, blood clots present and wound was horizontally placed.

2.Incised wound l” x 1/4" x muscle deep on middle of left arm margins clean gaping present, blood clots present.

3.Punctured wound 1-1/4’ x 1/2" x chest cavity deep on right side chest 1" outer to mid line chest and 4" away and above to right nipple, lyi



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top