ARIJIT PASAYAT, P.SATHASIVAM, AFTAB ALAM
B. Venkat Swamy – Appellant
Versus
Vijaya Nehru – Respondent
Judgment
Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J. —
1.Challenge in this appeal is to the Judgment of the Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court directing acquittal of respondent no.1 who was convicted for alleged commission of offences punishable under Section 498A and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’). Respondent hereinafter referred to as the ‘accused’) and his mother faced trial for alleged commission of offence punishable under Section 498A IPC. In addition, respondent-accused was found guilty of offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act (in short ‘DP Act’). The learned Sessions Judge, Kurnool, found that the accusations against A2 i.e. mother of the respondent - accused were not established and she was acquitted of the charges. However, respondent-accused was found guilty of the offence punishable under Sections 498A, 302 IPC and Section 4 of the DP Act.
2.Prosecution version in a nutshell is as follows :
Prosecution witnesses are the residents of Kurnool. A-1 is the resident of Hyderabad. PWs. 1 and 2 are the parents of Shreelakshmi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘deceased’). PW3 the brother of PW.1 and PW.7 is the sister of PW
State of U.P. v. Ashok Kumar Srivastava
C. Chenga Reddy and Ors. v. State of A.P.
State of Haryana v. Jagbir Singh and Anr.
Hanumant Govind Nargundkar and Anr. V. State of Madhya Pradesh
Eradu and Ors. v. State of Hyderabad
Hukam Singh v. State of Rajasthan
Earabhadrappa v. State of Karnataka
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra
State of U.P. v. Sukhbasi and Ors.
Ashok Kumar Chatterjee v. State of M.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.