ARIJIT PASAYAT, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
Chattar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J. —
1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court upholding the conviction of appellant No.1-Chattar Singh (hereinafter referred to as ‘A-1’) for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. He was also convicted for offence punishable under Section 201 and Section 498A IPC. Different sentences were imposed for the said offences. Appellant-Mange Ram (hereinafter referred to as ‘A-2’) was convicted for offence punishable under Section 498A IPC and was sentenced to undergo RI for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/-. The conviction recorded by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak, was confirmed by Division Bench of the High Court as also the sentences for both the appellants.
2. Background facts giving rise to the prosecution are as follows:
A young girl, namely, Guddi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘deceased’) aged about 26 years, belonged to village Nimly in district Bhiwani in Haryana. Her marriage was performed with Chattar Singh, A-1, son of Mange Ram, A-2 of village Sahlawas, in district Rohtak, in the year 1990. Both the families are agriculturists. A daughter
State of Rajasthan v. Raja Ram
State of U.P. v. Ashok Kumar Srivastava
C. Chenga Reddy v. State of A.P.
State of Haryana v. Jagbir Singh
Hanumant Govind Nargundkar v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Hukam Singh v. State of Rajasthan
Earabhadrappa v. State of Karnataka
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra
Ashok Kumar Chatterjee v. State of M.P.
Padala Veera Reddy v. State of A.P.
Balwinder Singh v. State of Punjab
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.