H.K.SEMA, R.V.RAVEENDRAN
State Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
S. N. Goyal – Respondent
JUDGMENT (R.V. RAVEENDRAN, J.)
Theses appeals by special leave are filed by a defendant-employer (State Bank of India) against the judgment dated 11.12.2003 of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in R.S.A. No.4184 of 2002.
2. A charge-sheet dated 28.4.1994 was issued by the Appellant Bank to the respondent alleging that when he was posted as the Branch Manager of appellants Kalanwali Branch, Sirsa, Haryana, he had received cash payments tendered by two customers of the Bank, for being credited to their loan accounts, and temporarily misappropriated such amounts and had belatedly deposited them to the borrowers accounts (after about five months in one case and two and half months in another). The said acts amounted to a misconduct, violative of Rule 50(4) of the State Bank of India Officers Service Rules (Service Rules for short). An enquiry was held in regard to the said charge. The Enquiry Officer submitted his report dated 11.11.1994 holding that the charge was proved. The Disciplinary Authority furnished a copy of the said report to the respondent and gave him an opportunity to show cause in the matter.
3. Rule 68(3) of the Service Rules required, where the Disciplinary Authority w
Bank of India vs. D.C. Aggarwal
Mohd. Quaramuddin (dead) By LRs. vs. State of AP
Executive Committee of UP State Warehousing Corporation Ltd. Vs. Chandra Kiran Tyagi
Sirsi Municipality vs. Cecelia Kom Francies Tellis
Executive Committee of Vaish Degree College vs. Lakshmi Narain
Referred to : Dr. S. Dutt vs. University of Delhi
Smt. J. Tiwari vs. Smt. Jawala Devi Vidya Mandir
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.