C.K.THAKKER, AFTAB ALAM
PATEL RAJNIKANT DHULABHAI – Appellant
Versus
PATEL CHANDRAKANT DHULABHAI – Respondent
JUDGMENT
C.K. Thakker, J. -
1. The present contempt petitions are filed by the petitioners against respondent Nos. 1 to 3, alleged contemners, praying that they be held guilty of `civil contempt for violating orders passed by this Court on April 26, 2004 and on January 10, 2005 and be punished accordingly. A prayer is also made directing the contemners to deposit the amount received from third parties in consideration of transfer of property effected by them during the period of interim orders of this Court.
2. Shortly stated the facts of the case are that petitioners and respondent Nos. 1, 4 and 5 (in Special Leave Petitions) are real brothers and heirs and legal representatives of one Dhulabhai Patel. It was the case of the petitioners that in 1961, one Chandulal Muljibhai Parikh and Dhulabhai Patel (father of petitioners and respondent Nos. 1, 4 and 5) purchased land bearing Revenue Survey Nos. 459/2, 464, 465, 466/1 and 466/2 admeasuring 6 acres and 9 gunthas of village Atladara, Taluka and District Baroda in the State of Gujarat from one Parvatibai Ingle by a registered sale deed. According to the petitioners, the amount of consideration was paid from the funds of Hindu Undivid
AttorneyGeneral v. Times Newspaper Ltd.
Tayabbhai M. Bagasarawala v. Hind Rubber Industries (P) Ltd.
Kapildeo Prasad Sah and Ors. v. State of Bihar and Ors.
Anil Ratan Sarkar and Ors. v. Hirak Ghosh and Ors.
REFERRED TO : Ashok Paper Kamgar Union v. Dharam Godha and Ors.
All Bengal Excise Licensees Association v. Raghabendra Singh and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.