SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 1614

R.V.RAVEENDRAN, AFTAB ALAM
Principal, Kendriya Vidyalaya – Appellant
Versus
Saurabh Chaudhary – Respondent


JUDGMENT AFTAB ALAM, J.

1. Heard counsel for the parties.

2. Leave granted.

3. The appeal arises from a controversy about admission of a boy to class XI in the school from where he appeared and passed in the class X examination held by the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) in the academic year 2007-08. The school declined to give him admission because his marks were lower than the cut off fixed for admission to class XI in the admission guidelines for the school. The boy, represented by his father took the matter to the Madras High Court in Writ Petition No.22472 of 2007. Before the High Court, in support of the boys claim for admission reliance was placed on the decision of this court in Principal, Cambridge School vs. Payal Gupta, 1995 (5) SCC 512 and the decisions of the Calcutta High Court in Debashish Kr. Gupta vs. State of West Bengal, AIR 1999 Cal. 300 and the Madras High Court in D. Aravinth vs. State of Tamil Nadu, (2007) 4 M.L.J. 400. The Madras High Court upheld the students claim and by judgment and order dated August 16, 07 directed the school from where he passed the class X CBSE examination to admit him to class XI. This appeal is taken against the judgment




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top