PRIVY COUNCIL [ON APPEAL FROM THEEAST INDIES]
SIR JAMES W. COLVILE, SIR BARNES PEACOCK, SIR MONTAGUE E. SMITH, AND SIR ROBERT
RANEE SONET KOWAR - Appellant
Versus
MIRZA HIMMUT BAHADOOR, MUSSUMAT BISMULLAH BEGUM (ALIAS NUNHOO SAHIBA), AND MUSSUMAT SAHIBZA-DEE BEGUM - Respondents
On Appeal From The High Court at Bengal.
Decided On : February, 11, 1876.
Judgement
RAJAH MODENERAIN SINGH was the proprietor of the whole of mouzah Tranpore, belonging to the zemindary of Tikaree. He had two Hindu Ranees, the Appellant and Ranee Armedh, who, on his death, divided his estate into shares of 8 1/2 annas to Armedh, and 7 1/2 annas to the Appellant. He had no children by either of his Ranees.
By a Mahomedan concubine of the Sheeah sect, named Burratee Begum, he had a daughter named Shurfoonnissa, and other children. Six days after the birth of Shurfoonnissa, on the 8th of Magh, 1248 (January, 1841) the Rajah executed a mokurreree pottah of the said mouzah in favour of his said illegitimate daughter, reserving to himself a certain rent-charge out of the same. The grant was in these terms—
77 Law. Rep. 3 Ind. App. 92 ( 1875- 1876) Ranee Sonet Kowar V. Mirza Himmut Bahadoor
178
" Whereas the mouzah aforesaid original with dependency on a uniform annual jumna of Rs.301 sicca from 1248 Fuslee, with the malwajhat all kinds of grain, the fisheries, forests, tanks, fountains, ponds, the khod kosht lands, the barren and productive trees, and all the appurtenances thereto, excepting the zemindary salamee (presents) the Bishen Barab, Sheopereet, Neyaz Durgah (torn in the original) lands, the abkaree, palm-juice go-downs the cost of embankment assistance for the construction of houses and brick built and mud wells, the village expenses being all borne by the mokurrereedar in all without any objection. Condition as to calamities has been granted as a mokurreree lease from generation to generation. It is required that considering yourself the fixed mokurrereedar of the mouzah aforesaid, you shall make proper cultivation and regularly pay the mokurreree rent year after year, crop after crop, and installment after installment into my treasury. The gain or loss shall be yours. You shall not bring any objection as to drought, inundation, hail, and other calamities of the soil and the seasons. You shall make such settlements and use such exertions as will increase the cultivation more than before. You shall further give strict injunction to your amlah and lessees that they do not allow thieves and highway robbers to reside within their boundaries, and (torn in the original). Hence these few words are executed as a mokurreree pottah from generation to generation, that it may be of use when required."
The pottah was then handed over by the Rajah to Burratee Begum, by whom it was retained till her death. The Rajah died in September, 1857, Shurfoonnissa having predeceased him, ac-cording to the finding of the High Court. From the time of the making of the grant, the rents, at the rate reserved, were received from Burratee Begum by the Rajah, and after his death by the Appellant, as regards her share thereof; although the name of Shurfoonnissa continued to be used in the receipts long after her death. Burratee Begum died on the 9th of Falgon, 1267, or February, 1860; and for five years thereafter the Appellant received her share of the rent from the Respondents, being the two daughters and widow of a deceased son of the Rajah and the said Burratee Begum. In 1865 the two Ranees endeavoured to disturb the possession by Jodhun Singh, the lessee of the Respondents, of the said mouzah; and on the 6th of February, 1869, the Appellant sued to recover possession of her share thereof in the Court of the subordinate Judge of zillah Gya ; and obtained a decree to that effect on the 30th of March, 1870.
On the 23rd of May, 1871, the High Court (L, 8. Jackson and Ainslie, JJ.) reversed this decision in a judgment the material portions of which are as follows—
" The lower Court has held that the grant to Shurfoonnissa was not merely for life but in perpetuity. But inasmuch as she died childless, and in a recent decision of this Court reported in 12 Weekly Reporter, page 512, it was held that in the circumstances of this family no right of inheritance under Imameah law vests in the surviving brother or sister; the subordinat
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.